He's not bad on Seneca, which was written (I think) in 2003 and thus is a bit more caught up - he's more into identifications of self and how the person is the microcosm of the world and the interrelationship of politics and philosophy than sex, but he's also more... grounded than he is when he's doing this kind of theoretical kit. I've never read any of his work on homosexuality, which now I come to think of it is actually A Bit Odd.