Date: 2010-03-30 07:23 am (UTC)
That's the first time I've seen a legitimate argument for avoiding the passive voice, rather than the usual 'oh it's a bit confusing'. Of course, this argument falls down if the subject of one's passive construction is a person rather than an abstract concept, e.g. why should one automatically prefer 'the Spartans attacked the Athenians' over 'the Athenians were attacked by the Spartans'. And I do think that to banish the passive voice altogether is to lose something from the richness of the language.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

the_lady_lily: (Default)
the_lady_lily

December 2016

M T W T F S S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 09:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios