I actually like the blend of Hinds, Edmunds and then Pucci's rather different book for various takes on intertextuality. I like the hinds, but even more so than many of the other books in the series it reads as "meditations on intertextuality" rather than something larger.
As for intertextuality as a feature of prose - just look at Tacitus :-) I.e. I agree with you.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-02-20 02:52 am (UTC)As for intertextuality as a feature of prose - just look at Tacitus :-) I.e. I agree with you.