Oct. 16th, 2009

the_lady_lily: (Erm no)
"We request the reversal of the Research Councils and HEFCE policy to direct funds to projects whose outcomes are determined to have a significant ‘impact’. The arts and humanities do have such an impact, but it is typically difficult if not impossible to judge this in the short-term. Academic excellence is the best predictor of impact in the longer term, and it is on academic excellence alone that research should be judged. ‘Users’ who are not academic experts are not fit to judge the academic excellence of research any more than employers are fit to mark student essays. The UK is renowned for its creative industries. But the roots of creativity in the intellectual life of the nation need sustained support and evaluations based on short-term impact will lead to less impact in the long-term. We also request the abandonment of plans to merge subject panels based on spurious claims of disciplinary and methodological similarities. Merging panels in most cases would undermine both methodological integrity and disciplinary identities and undermine the world class research that the UK currently produces."

Please follow the link if you would like to sign the petition.

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] purple_pen for pointing this one out. For classicists who aren't aware of the proposed panel mergers, they're suggesting that Classics and Ancient History should be merged into 'History, Classics and Archaeology'. Which I am trying very hard not to be very, very rude about.

If you are feeling sufficiently moved, you could also write to your MP about it.

Profile

the_lady_lily: (Default)
the_lady_lily

December 2016

M T W T F S S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 06:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios